Evidence-based AML & KYC investigation platform
Submit a compliance brief. Deepheem retrieves primary regulatory sources, classifies every finding by evidence strength, and returns a structured investigation report your EDD file can rely on — in under 10 minutes.
For AML analysts, KYC teams, and MLROs who need defensible, source-backed research.
Used for AML, KYC, and EDD workflows
Is this institution FCA-authorised or in the application process?
Should I focus on EDD triggers for high-risk customers, or the broader MLR 2017 obligations framework?
EDD obligations clearly established under MLR 2017 Reg. 33. FCA guidance confirms high-risk triggers. Two findings supported, one partially supported.
Evidence supported · 3 regulatory sourcesEDD required for high-risk customers — MLR 2017 Regulation 33
SupportedFCA enforcement pattern indicates heightened scrutiny of payment institutions
PartialInvestigation Workflow
Every investigation is transparent — sources retrieved from primary regulatory databases, classified by authority type, and each finding assessed against the retrieved text before you see any output. Not a chatbot. Not a search engine. An investigation structuring layer.
Ask
Submit your brief — AML issue, compliance matter, or regulatory question. Jurisdiction, regulatory framework, specific question. No template required.
Search
Deepheem searches FCA enforcement records, regulatory guidance, legislation.gov.uk, and jurisdiction-specific regulatory databases. Citations are constructed and verified directly against the source.
Classify & Verify
Sources classified as Regulatory Authority, Official Legislation, or Government Source. Each finding assessed as Supported, Partially Supported, Unsupported, or Contradicted against the retrieved text. Insufficient evidence returns UNCLASSIFIED — not a speculative rating.
Report
A structured investigation output — supported conclusions, identified evidence gaps, contradictions, and regulatory mapping. Every source authority type is explicit. Formatted for EDD files and compliance audit records. Requires independent professional review before regulatory reliance.
Regulatory investigation requires a defensible evidence basis — not a search result, not a risk score without a paper trail.
Scope & Compliance Boundaries
Deepheem is an evidence synthesis and investigation structuring platform — not a compliance engine or legal advisor.
Structures the evidence record — does not make compliance determinations. The MLRO and responsible officer retain accountability and apply professional judgment to every output.
UNCLASSIFIED is returned when evidence is insufficient — no speculative risk ratings, ever. The evidence gate is enforced by design and cannot be overridden.
MLRO and compliance officer retain full accountability — Deepheem accelerates the research stage, not the decision.
Not a screening or sanctions tool — structures the investigation that follows a screening alert, not in place of it. Name-matching and transaction monitoring remain separate.
All findings require independent professional review before inclusion in compliance files, regulatory submissions, or any form of professional reliance.
Compliance & AML Investigation — one evidence standard.
Built for AML analysts, KYC teams, and MLROs who need structured research — not a risk score with no paper trail. Every investigation enforces the same evidence gate: insufficient evidence returns UNCLASSIFIED, not a speculative assessment.
Compliance & AML Investigation
AML/KYC/EDD obligation research and regulatory risk assessment across UK, US, and Nigerian regulatory frameworks.
- FCA · FinCEN · CBN enforcement records
- CDD & EDD obligation mapping
- Companies House & adverse media research
- Regulatory Authority · Official Legislation
- PDF export with full source citations and evidence map
Know the evidence basis behind every finding.
Every source is classified by authority type — Regulatory Authority, Official Legislation, or Government Source. The distinction between a binding statute and an industry article is explicit in every report, not buried in a risk score.
Start free. No credit card required.
Run your first investigation and see how it works — no payment needed.
- Try your first 2 investigations free
- Compliance investigation
- All investigation depths
- Source classification & evidence assessment
- Watermarked report · no PDF download
- 10 investigations / month
- 1 active seat
- Quick & Standard depths
- UK jurisdiction
- BAILII citation verification
- Source classification & evidence assessment
- PDF export — watermarked
- 30 investigations / month
- 3 active seats
- Quick, Standard & Deep dive depths
- UK, Nigeria & US jurisdictions
- BAILII citation verification
- Follow-up questions on any investigation
- PDF export — no watermark
- 100 investigations/month (10 seats, shared pool)
- Quick, Standard & Deep dive depths
- UK, Nigeria & US jurisdictions
- BAILII citation verification
- Binding vs persuasive flags
- Follow-up questions on any investigation
- PDF export — no watermark
Supported Regulatory Sources
Every investigation retrieves from primary regulatory databases — not generic web search. Each source is classified by authority type before any finding is assessed.
- ·FCA enforcement records & Final Notices
- ·Money Laundering Regulations 2017
- ·FCA Financial Crime Guide (FCG)
- ·JMLSG guidance (Parts I & II)
- ·FATF recommendations
- ·legislation.gov.uk — Acts & SIs
- ·Companies House filings
- ·BAILII case law (legal module)
- ·FinCEN advisories & SARs guidance
- ·SEC enforcement actions
- ·OFAC sanctions guidance
- ·FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual
- ·Federal Register rule-making
- ·DOJ enforcement records
- ·CBN AML/CFT Regulations & circulars
- ·EFCC enforcement records
- ·MLPA 2022 (Money Laundering Prevention and Prohibition Act)
- ·CAC corporate filings
Source authority classification: Regulatory Authority · Official Legislation · Government Source · Secondary Commentary — explicit on every finding.
What a Deepheem investigation actually returns
A structured EDD research brief — not a list of links, not a risk score.
This output requires independent professional review before inclusion in any compliance file or regulatory submission.
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know before getting started.
No. Deepheem does not replace name-matching or sanctions screening tools. It replaces the manual regulatory research you do after a screening hit — building the evidentiary basis for your EDD file, adverse media review, or regulatory risk assessment. Use Deepheem to structure the investigation; document it in your compliance system.
Sources are grouped by jurisdiction. UK: FCA enforcement records and Final Notices, Money Laundering Regulations 2017, FCA Financial Crime Guide, JMLSG guidance, FATF recommendations, Companies House filings, legislation.gov.uk. US: FinCEN advisories and SARs guidance, SEC enforcement, OFAC sanctions guidance, Federal Register rule-making, FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual, DOJ enforcement. Nigeria: CBN AML/CFT Regulations and circulars, EFCC enforcement, Money Laundering Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022 (MLPA 2022), CAC filings. Every source is classified by authority type — Regulatory Authority, Official Legislation, Government Source, or Secondary Commentary.
Deepheem output provides a structured, evidence-assessed regulatory research report suitable as a research input to your EDD or compliance process. All findings cite the specific retrieved source. You should review and apply professional judgment before including findings in a compliance file or regulatory submission.
No. Deepheem outputs are evidence-based investigation findings. They do not constitute legal advice, compliance guidance, or professional advice of any kind. All findings must be independently verified by a qualified professional before reliance.
Your queries and reports are never used to train models. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Business plan customers can request region-pinned storage for regulatory compliance requirements.