AML & legal investigations — evidence-verified reports in minutes
Turn fragmented regulatory research into audit-ready, citation-backed investigation reports.
AML investigations require manual validation across multiple regulatory and legal sources.
Used for AML, KYC, EDD and legal research workflows
Is this institution FCA-authorised or in the application process?
Should I focus on EDD triggers for high-risk customers, or the broader MLR 2017 obligations framework?
EDD obligations clearly established under MLR 2017 Reg. 33. FCA guidance confirms high-risk triggers. Two findings supported, one partially supported.
Evidence supported · 3 regulatory sourcesEDD required for high-risk customers — MLR 2017 Regulation 33
SupportedFCA enforcement pattern indicates heightened scrutiny of payment institutions
PartialRegulatory and legal work requires defensible reasoning, not just retrieved information.
- ✕Manual evidence validation across FCA, BAILII, FinCEN, and other regulatory databases — source by source
- ✕Time-consuming cross-referencing of regulatory guidance, case law, and enforcement records across multiple sources
- ✕No reliable way to distinguish binding authority from advisory guidance or secondary commentary
- ✕Investigation reports assembled manually — no consistent structure, no reproducible evidence trail
- ✓All relevant regulatory and legal sources searched in a single investigation
- ✓Every source classified by authority type — legislation, regulatory, judicial
- ✓Citation-backed investigation report delivered in minutes, ready to use
Search. Weigh. Verdict.
Every investigation is transparent — sources retrieved live, classified by authority type, and each finding assessed before you see a result. Not a chatbot. Not a search engine.
Ask
Submit your brief — compliance issue, regulatory matter, or legal question. Jurisdiction, regulatory framework, specific question. No template required.
Search
Deepheem searches FCA enforcement records, regulatory guidance, BAILII, legislation.gov.uk, and jurisdiction-specific databases. Citations are constructed and verified directly against the source.
Weigh
Sources are classified as Regulatory Authority, Official Legislation, Government Source, or Judicial Authority. Citations rated VERIFIED, LIKELY, or UNVERIFIED. Findings assessed as Supported, Partial, Unsupported, or Contradicted.
Verdict
A structured investigation report — supported conclusions, evidence gaps, contradictions, and overall assessment. Regulatory authority and binding vs persuasive flags included. Not legal or compliance advice.
Two investigation modules. One evidence standard.
Built for AML analysts, KYC teams, compliance officers, and legal practitioners. Every module enforces the same evidence gate — no speculative ratings, no guesses when evidence is insufficient.
Compliance & AML Investigation
AML/KYC/EDD obligation research and regulatory risk assessment across UK, US, and Nigerian regulatory frameworks.
- FCA · FinCEN · CBN enforcement records
- CDD & EDD obligation mapping
- Companies House & adverse media research
- Regulatory Authority · Official Legislation
- PDF export with full source citations and evidence map
Legal Investigation
Case law precedent, statutory research, and BAILII citation verification — across UK, Nigerian, and US jurisdictions.
- BAILII citation verification — VERIFIED · LIKELY · UNVERIFIED
- legislation.gov.uk · Acts & statutory instruments
- Binding vs persuasive authority flags
- UK, Nigeria & US jurisdictions
- Judicial Authority · Official Legislation classification
- PDF export with verified case citations
Know the evidence basis behind every finding.
Every source is classified by authority type — Regulatory Authority, Official Legislation, Judicial Authority, or Government Source. The distinction between a binding statute and an industry article is explicit in every report, not buried in a risk score.
Run your first investigation freeReports your counsel, compliance officer, or client will accept.
Export a structured PDF with findings, direct quotations from retrieved sources, verified citations, and a professional disclaimer — immediately after every investigation.
See plansEDD is required where a customer or transaction presents a higher risk of money laundering — MLR 2017 Regulation 33(1).[1]
FCA enforcement data indicates heightened scrutiny of payment institutions for AML systems and controls failures (FCG 3.2).[2][3]
Start free. Pay only when it saves you time.
No contracts. Cancel or change plan any time.
- 1 full investigation report
- Compliance or legal — your choice
- All investigation depths
- Source classification & evidence assessment
- Watermarked report · no PDF download
- 10 investigations / month
- 1 active seat
- Quick & Standard depths
- UK jurisdiction
- BAILII citation verification
- Source classification & evidence assessment
- PDF export — watermarked
- 30 investigations / month
- 3 active seats
- Quick, Standard & Deep dive depths
- UK, Nigeria & US jurisdictions
- BAILII citation verification
- Follow-up questions on any investigation
- PDF export — no watermark
- 100 investigations/month (10 seats, shared pool)
- Quick, Standard & Deep dive depths
- UK, Nigeria & US jurisdictions
- BAILII citation verification
- Binding vs persuasive flags
- Follow-up questions on any investigation
- PDF export — no watermark
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know before getting started.
No. Deepheem does not replace name-matching or sanctions screening tools. It replaces the manual regulatory research you do after a screening hit — building the evidentiary basis for your EDD file, adverse media review, or regulatory risk assessment. Use Deepheem to structure the investigation; document it in your compliance system.
Sources are grouped by jurisdiction. UK: FCA enforcement records and Final Notices, Money Laundering Regulations 2017, FCA Financial Crime Guide, JMLSG guidance, FATF recommendations, Companies House filings, BAILII case law, legislation.gov.uk. US: FinCEN advisories and SARs guidance, SEC enforcement, OFAC sanctions guidance, Federal Register rule-making, FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual, DOJ enforcement. Nigeria: CBN AML/CFT Regulations and circulars, EFCC enforcement, Money Laundering Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022 (MLPA 2022), CAC filings. Every source is classified by authority type — Regulatory Authority, Official Legislation, Government Source, or Secondary Commentary.
No. Deepheem replaces the manual preliminary research you do before you open your database. Use Deepheem to identify relevant cases, statutes, and issues quickly — then deepen and verify on Westlaw or LexisNexis.
Deepheem output provides a structured, evidence-assessed regulatory research report suitable as a research input to your EDD or compliance process. All findings cite the specific retrieved source. You should review and apply professional judgment before including findings in a compliance file or regulatory submission.
No. Deepheem outputs are evidence-based investigation findings. They do not constitute legal advice, compliance guidance, or professional advice of any kind. All findings must be independently verified by a qualified professional before reliance.
Your queries and reports are never used to train models. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Business plan customers can request region-pinned storage for regulatory compliance requirements.
Run your first investigation free.
AML, KYC, EDD and legal investigation reports with verified citations — no setup required.